Monday, 13 April 2026

Newsround: 2 Postdoc positions, Keynote speaker announced

͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Newsround: 2 Postdoc positions, Keynote speaker announced

And an update on the Campaign to save the BBC Archive

Stephanie Decker FAcSS FBAM and Paula de la Cruz-Fernández

Apr 13

READ IN APP

Happy Monday everyone! To avoid spamming your inbox, we are trying something new. The Monday post will, from now on, run in a Digest format, that is, it will summarise multiple updates and news items in one post.

News briefing: Scholars urge BBC to rethink changes to archive access
Job Advert: 2 Postdoctoral Positions in the Global History of Rubber
Announcement: 16th OAP Workshop announces keynote speaker

Scholars urge BBC to rethink changes to archive access

Historians say their ability to study material held in ‘mother lode of all 20th-century archives’ diminished by long suspension of vetting requests

Full article in Times Higher Education.

Call for Applicants: 2 Postdoctoral Positions in the Global History of Rubber

The Institute of History at the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) is recruiting 2 postdoctoral researchers for the ERC Consolidator Grant Project ‘WILDHIST – Wild Rubber in the Industrial Age: A Global History of Production’, led by Dr. David Pretel.

Postdoc 1. The history of rubber production in the Amazon rainforest.
Postdoc 2. The history of rubber production in the Congo Basin.

Please send your application to david.pretel@csic.es and andrea.yanez@csic.es

Project Description

The Project WILDHIST aims to offer a comprehensive, multi-sited and multi-scale global history of wild rubber production during the industrial age. It investigates the hypothesis that wild rubber industries in the tropical rainforests of Africa and Latin America were key sites in the broader dynamics of industrialisation and scientific research from the early 19th century to the Second World War, forming an integral part of the era’s expanding global networks of knowledge exchange. The project moves beyond plantations to focus on wild production and smallholders’ cultivation in rainforests, emphasizing production processes rather than consumption or trade, and placing much stronger emphasis on the study of exploration, extraction, processing, transportation, experimentation, and manufacturing than has been typical of historical research on rainforest commodities.

WILDHIST combines an analysis of contrasting non-plantation histories of rubber production in the Amazon, Congo Basin and so-called Maya Forest with broader histories of transnational interaction. The project rethinks and rewrites the global history of wild rubber by systematically and critically exploring a rich array of written, visual and oral sources located throughout the world. Its trans-local, interdisciplinary, comparative, digital and visual methodology will provide a comprehensive historical account of how rubber was transformed into commodities and then final goods for local, regional or global markets. Beyond academia, WILDHIST contributes to discussions about bioprospecting, sustainability and labour in rainforests. To address the challenge of writing more inclusive histories of science, technology, and industrialisation, the project also considers collective memory as represented in museums, material culture, and industrial heritage.

The project has three objectives:
1) Studying the actors, techniques, skills, knowledge and relations of production at rainforests’ rubber frontiers;
2) Reconstructing, mapping and analysing the transnational chains of rubber production, including networks of science and expertise;
3) Exploring the visual representation of rubber production throughout the world using tools of digital and spatial humanities.

https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101171213

Requirements

Research Field
History

Education Level
PhD or equivalent

Skills/Qualifications

PhD in history, history of science, economic history or associated fields (Latin American studies, African studies, science and technology studies, anthropology, digital humanities), and a strong interest in the project.
Good command of written and spoken English and, depending on research specialisation, Portuguese, Spanish and/or French.
Be based in Madrid for the duration of the project.
Expected to publish articles, book chapters, and/or a book manuscript / edited volume.
Ability to collaborate within a team and to work independently

Languages
ENGLISH, good level

Research Field
History

Additional Information

Benefits

• A three-year contract (full-time).
• A gross salary of 43,827 EUR.
• A fully equipped workspace at the Institute of History.
• Funding for research-related purposes, participation in international conferences, and organisation of events.
• Mentorship in applying for tenure-track and tenure positions at CSIC.

Additional comments

HOW TO APPLY:
Your application must include the following documents:
• Motivation letter (1 page).
• Research proposal outlining the work you would undertake while on the WILDHIST project (1 page).
• Curriculum Vitae.
• Writing sample: PhD thesis, article or book chapter.

Please send your application to david.pretel@csic.es and andrea.yanez@csic.es
Application deadline: 24 April 2026.

16th OAP Workshop announces keynote speaker

Dear colleagues,

We are delighted to announce that Professor Andrew Pickering will be the opening keynote speaker of the 16th OAP Workshop, taking place on June 3–4, 2026 at CBS.

This year’s edition promises to be particularly rich and engaging, featuring two panels, three keynote lectures, around sixty presentations, and dedicated sessions for the 10th Dauphine Philosophy Workshop (program online very soon). OAP 2026 will once again bring together a vibrant international community to discuss cutting-edge research across a wide range of topics.

We warmly invite you to register and secure your participation via the following link:
https://www.tilmeld.dk/oap2026

In addition, we are pleased to highlight a special pre-event that will take place on June 2 at the French Embassy in Copenhagen: the first GeoHos Workshop. This event will focus on historical and geopolitical perspectives and theories of organizations. Registration is open and free, and can be completed here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdYGOecxcRSV2oRCt2_KbWwYydLWQq0NYCmlZKsO_6wcEJqIw/viewform?usp=sharing&ouid=100923006067412553031

We very much hope to see many of you in Copenhagen for these exciting events.

Best regards,

The OC of OAP 2026

Like the new digest format? Or do you prefer the old individual posts? Tell us!

POLL

What do you think about the new digest format?

It's great - keep it!

Don't like it, make it go away

You're currently a free subscriber to History in Organizations. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Comment

Restack

Sunday, 12 April 2026

A Review of The Handmaid's Tale, by Margaret Attwood

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

A Review of The Handmaid's Tale, by Margaret Attwood

Mark Buckley

Apr 13

READ IN APP

The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian novel, written by Margaret Attwood, and published in 1985. It is presented as a first person narrative, by an unnamed woman. She is now known only by her new name, Offred, given to her since the new regime took power. It denotes that she is “owned” by Fred, a Commander in the regime. Other handmaids are named using the same format.

The novel describes a totalitarian state, bent on eradicating all aspects of life which do not accord with a strict, literalist reading of the Bible. It is a theocratic dictatorship, where all power resides with men, and women of all levels of status are strictly controlled.

The government seeks to reverse the political and social advances women made in the 1960s and 1970s, and it has removed women’s right to control their own sexuality, and their reproductive choices. It emerges that matters as commonplace as reading and writing are forbidden to all women, and left in the hands of men. The right to vote has also been removed.

The production of babies was very high on the regime’s agenda. Fertility had dropped, due to environmental factors; so women with viable ovaries were rounded up, and then placed into suitable homes, in order to breed.

The biblical story of Jacob and his wife Rachel, is clearly the inspiration for the practices imposed on the handmaids. In that story, Rachel is unable to produce children, so she offers her handmaid, Bilhah, as a child-bearing vessel for Jacob, her husband, so that his line will be assured.

Bilhah has no future claim on any children produced, and her consent to the sexual contact is not required.

The setting is Boston, Massachusetts. The book is set in the “late twentieth century”. It relies entirely on the handmaid’s recollections, which have been sourced from a collection of audio tapes, found a century or so later, and here the subject of a scholarly dissertation on the past.

The Epilogue as exposition.

This expository device, called “Historical Notes”, appears at the rear end of the novel, and purports to be an appendix. It is an essential element of the novel as a whole, if we are to understand the world that Attwood has created. It allows us access to Offred’s innermost thoughts, fears and hopes, and explains how and why the dictatorship was installed, and some of the many mechanisms involved in exerting, and maintaining complete social control.

It explains some of the concerns within the leadership of the regime; the collapse of human fertility, environmental degradation, the failings of established religions, and a corruption of moral and social norms. Women are seen as the fatal weakness in the fabric of society, and their suppression is the solution.

It treats the action of the book as being solidly from the past, historical. The lecture resists the temptation of triumphalism, or post-facto moralising, but it does treat the events described as quaint, and consistent with one of several ‘periods’ under review.

The observations presented in the book are treated as primary source material, and not overtly judged by the person giving the lecture. The ‘normal’ of this future is different to how we see our own future, but in a suggestive and uncertain way.

Is the book successful in its creation of a dystopian world?

Margaret Attwood has commented, in response to winning a science fiction award for this book, that none of her material belongs in the realm of science fiction. She went on to explain that all the privations and punishments, used here mainly against women, have been practised, somewhere on earth, in the past, or indeed the present.

Men are also strictly controlled, but in less intrusive, de-personalising ways. And men can rise to power. Women cannot, or at least only so far. The depiction of a repressive system of government is heightened by its setting in parts of Harvard, and other familiar landmarks around the city. The contrast with the present is jarring.

There is a long history of dystopian writing, but the two books with which this novel is mostly compared, are Brave New World, and 1984. The reason this novel may create more of a lasting impact than either of them, is that her world is made from real, everyday examples which we can relate to personally. Even now, the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned Roe v Wade.

So this is not science fiction, because, even though it was written last century, we can recognise, if not the total sum of the book’s repressions, at the least we can see aspects of the regime’s thinking, the fear of women’s empowerment, the wish to put the genie of freedom back in the bottle.

Attwood wrote this novel in 1985, and it is perhaps no coincidence that Thatcher (elected in 1979) and Reagan (elected in 1980) were forerunners to a reactionary assault on civil liberties in the English speaking world.

The Handmaid’s Tale foretells where the neoliberals were heading. Margaret Attwood is a politically aware writer, and she was no doubt conscious of this shift in the wind of the the late seventies and the eighties.

She also part-wrote the novel in West Berlin. She was well aware of the opressive nature of the East German state, just across the Berlin Wall. She has admitted as much.

The recent resurgence of interest in the novel is arguably directly associated with Donald Trump’s first election win, in 2016. The second coming of Trump in 2024 has accentuated its immediacy. The rise of the religious right, the continued assault on women’s rights, the authoritarianism of the MAGA administration are all factors which add to the relevance of the book, but also to the need for such a book, right now.

Recent legislation in several U.S. states, as well as in Poland and Malta, seeks to criminalise abortion. This appears to be heading toward another round of theocratic lawmaking, and pressure on women’s lives. So the book, although written over forty years ago, still delivers a timely warning. Stay alert. Your freedom is a valuable, but fragile, thing.

This book is written to reflect the world view of a late twentieth century, educated woman, making her way in a repressive and dangerous world. Margaret Attwood’s writing is above all else immensely intelligent, and accomplished. There are no wasted words, but the book’s brevity does not undermine its message.

The movies and television shows will never deliver the punch that this seemingly slight book will. This is a harrowing story, but it fulfils its purpose. It makes us take the ongoing threats to our freedom seriously.

You're currently a free subscriber to Ask Bucko’s Substack. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Comment

Restack

genderequalitygoals

Monday, 13 April 2026