The May 14 RIOC board meeting began with public concern over the steam plant and ended with two votes that revealed more than any report could. Some meetings announce themselves by what is said. This one announced itself by what the room permitted to move and what it stopped before it could breathe.
The contested appointment of Lance A. Polivy had already drawn its line through the room before the board returned from executive session. Melissa Wade had read her warning aloud. She spoke of protocol, qualifications, conflict, and the old habits RIOC claims to have outgrown. The public heard her. The board heard her. Yet the appointment still came forward as if the machinery had already decided.
The evening carried two central subjects: whether the steam plant was safe to breathe around, and whether governance was safe to trust. Somehow the steam plant felt like the less dusty question.
A brief note:
This newsletter is written once a week and supported almost entirely by readers sharing it quietly with one another. If you were forwarded this, subscribing ensures it arrives without relying on someone else to remember you.
RIOC loves transparency the way vampires love sunrise: conceptually, from a safe distance. The public had heard Melissa. The board had heard Melissa. The appointment, apparently, had noise-canceling headphones.
President Benjamin Jones reached the sentence that was supposed to settle the unease: “For the avoidance of doubt…” That was where the reading changed. His body gathered inward. The words did not sound improvised. They sounded prepared, agreed upon, and placed in the record for a reason. Jones read them carefully, almost too carefully, his arms crossed close to him, his voice hanging on each clause. Watching him, one wondered whether he believed the language or merely understood why it had to be read.
Lance Polivy, Jones said, had “the same last name” as board member Howard Polivy. He was technically accurate, in the same way the Titanic encountered “some ice”. It was careful phrasing, narrow enough to almost disappear into itself, yet Melissa Wade had already called the relationship by its plainer name when she spoke of lease negotiations involving “his cousin’s building.” The sentence arrived dressed as ethics language, but it walked like legal insulation. The law may permit a relationship. It does not make Thanksgiving less awkward.
On the transcript, the language looks polished, prepared, and official. On video, it seemed heavier than that. I cannot enter President Jones’s mind, but I can describe what was visible: the guarded arms, the careful pacing, the hesitation around words that should have reassured everyone if the matter were as simple as the sentence made it sound. Then came the phrase “prevent corruption.” It was barely given air.
The law may permit a relationship. It does not make the relationship disappear. It also does not make prepared language easier to read when the room already knows why the language was prepared. What was clear was the discomfort.
Melissa Wade’s statement mattered because she did not merely object to Lance Polivy. She objected to the path that delivered him. The bylaws, she said, give the board the power to hire officers upon the recommendation of the CEO. The CEO recommends. The board hires. That distinction was supposed to matter.
By Melissa’s account, it had not mattered enough. She said the first time she was notified of Lance Polivy was after he had emerged as the sole candidate, from a process she did not know and one she believed did not include the search firm the board had approved. His name had already gone to chambers. A background check had already begun. Only then did the board receive the person it was being asked to approve. If the board was the hiring authority, it was introduced to its authority rather late in the evening.
Jones answered with order. He listed résumés, interviews, staff reviewers, and Governor’s Counsel. It sounded extensive. It sounded serious. But it did not answer the question Melissa had placed on the table. The process sounded extensive. So does a diner menu. That does not tell you who cooked the food. Did Lance Polivy come through the board-approved search firm? When was the board brought into the process? Why had chambers and background review begun before Melissa says the board was alerted?
That is the space the meeting never filled. Melissa questioned the doorway. Jones described the hallway. Both things can be true, and that is what made the moment troubling. A process can have many steps and still leave footprints going around the board.
Earlier in the meeting, the Governance Committee offered its own kind of lesson. Three policies had been revised: personally owned vehicle use, travel by personnel, and discretionary funds. Some had not been revised since 2013. They had been modernized, cleaned, corrected, and moved forward. The board approved them with little difficulty.
There was nothing wrong with updating old policies. RIOC needed that work. But the ease of it mattered because of what came later. The institution moved quickly when the work made the machinery look repaired. The old rules could be dusted off. The typos could be fixed. The missing Zoom-era language could be added. Penalties could be inserted.
Mark Block and Conway Ekpo helped give the room the language of compliance and the feeling of restored order. When the Polivy appointment came forward, Conway moved it. The motion did not linger. The vote followed.
That is why the later exchange with Lydia Tang mattered so much. Procedure had been flexible enough to clean old policies, orderly enough to bless a contested appointment, and efficient enough to move the room toward adjournment. But when a resident-safety resolution tried to reach the floor, procedure became a locked door.
Nothing wakes a policy faster than the possibility it might serve the room already in charge. The machinery moved quickly once the machinery itself stood to benefit. Procedure could stretch across thirteen years of neglect, dust itself off, and call it modernization. But it could not, apparently, stretch far enough to reach Lydia Tang’s resolution.
The Operations Advisory Committee had not merely talked about the steam plant. It had acted. Under the newer governance structure, committees were supposed to do more than listen politely and send concern back into the air. Lydia Tang had raised the need for a recommendation, and the committee unanimously supported moving forward on air monitoring while HPD delayed. The same concern extended to soil testing.
By the time the full board met, President Benjamin Jones had already offered one convenient update: HPD, he said, had confirmed that air monitoring was scheduled to begin Monday. That mattered. But it did not erase what the committee had done. A promise from HPD was not the same as a board resolution. A scheduled start date was not the same as resident oversight. And Monday had not yet arrived.
Then came Fay Christian’s Operations Committee report. She acknowledged the committee’s unanimous view. She reported the committee’s concern so gently it almost needed air monitoring of its own. She even called HPD’s responsiveness “lackadaisical.” But the recommendation arrived softened, folded into a report rather than presented as the resolution Lydia believed the committee had authorized.
That is why Lydia stepped in before adjournment. She was not inventing a new demand from the floor. She was reminding the room of a committee action that had been allowed to fade just as the meeting was about to close. The Operations Committee had authorized moving the matter forward as a resolution if HPD did not act. When soil testing was raised, Lydia added that the committee had unanimously supported that as well.
The resistance did not first come from the state’s representative chairing the meeting. It came from Lydia’s fellow board members. The state did not have to silence Lydia. Her colleagues, Marc Block and Conway Ekpo, got there first. Block pointed back toward Fay’s report, reducing Lydia’s objection to repetition: the Operations Committee had already been reported. Ekpo then supplied the procedural wall, backing the chair’s position that a resolution could not be raised without ten days’ notice. Lydia disagreed, saying the bylaws allowed board members to present resolutions and reminding the room that she had been there when they were written. The machinery did not need Albany to push it. It had local hands. The moment was almost efficient: Lydia brought the committee’s recommendation, and the room produced the reason it could not be heard.
That exchange is the heart of the story. Lydia tried to carry a unanimous committee recommendation into the full boardroom. The lawyer panel helped convert it into a procedural defect. Fay, who had chaired the committee, did not rescue the recommendation. Howard Polivy, seated beside the night’s other controversy, did not speak. The room did not need to shout Lydia down. It simply narrowed around her.
Then Fay moved to adjourn. Howard seconded. Lydia voted no. Dr. Michal Melamed voted no. Melissa Wade abstained. The meeting closed, but the committee’s unanswered recommendation remained behind, sitting in the room like resident safety itself: present, inconvenient, and somehow not on the agenda. That is how a public safety concern disappears at RIOC: not with a denial, but with a motion, a second, and the practiced sound of people leaving.
Share this with neighbors who still believe a committee recommendation should mean something.
Share
