The Weight Women Quietly CarryGrowing up as women in a culture that measures us by more than ourselves.
We can talk about progress—about calling out gender inequality—but the truth is, it remains deeply embedded in our culture and social lives. It’s an uncomfortable reality, one that persists despite how far we believe we’ve come. And in my culture, especially among people from my hometown, it feels even more pronounced. When I was younger, I didn’t question it much. I was too absorbed in my own world, too focused on my studies and personal life, to pay attention to anything beyond that. But as I grew older, built a life abroad and gained new experiences, gotten to know other cultures, I began to see things more clearly. I started to notice how Asian families, including my own, often overlook women. People may talk of gender equality, of their admiration for women’s accomplishments, but beneath it lies an imbalance. The standard for men to be seen as “good” or “successful” is often lower, while women are held to far higher expectations. We are expected to excel, to prove ourselves repeatedly and even then, it rarely feels enough. You can earn degrees, climb the corporate ladder, move across the world or choose a different path entirely. Yet, as a woman shaped by Asian culture, your worth is still so often measured by the partner you choose. If he is successful, attractive and accomplished, people will admire you, almost as if his qualities validate your own. And even when you exceed expectations, even when you are more capable or accomplished than the sons they compare you to, your value is still reduced to that choice. To the man you stand beside, rather than the person you’ve become. That’s just the reality of it.
My sister graduated just last year. She spent most of that time building a career out of something she’s genuinely passionate about. But I noticed something the moment she returned home after finishing her degree abroad. Instead of being congratulated for graduating with honors, or recognized for earning a merit-based scholarship, people asked her a different kind of question: Do you have a boyfriend? At the same time, a male relative of ours, who graduated around the same time, was met with an entirely different response. People asked if he needed help finding a job, offered their connections, sympathized with how difficult the job market is right now, and showed genuine interest in his future plans, even asking whether he intended to continue his studies. The contrast was just impossible to ignore. So how do we cope with something like this?Because the truth is, what I witnessed with my sister wasn’t an isolated moment. It was a reflection of something much deeper. Something many of us, as women, are sadly already familiar with. No matter where we go, how far we move, or what we achieve, these expectations have a way of following us. And the harder truth is this: you cannot undo generations of conditioning overnight. Culture, especially one that has been deeply embedded for so long, does not shift in the span of a single lifetime. Trying to change it entirely can feel exhausting—most times even futile. But that doesn’t mean we are powerless. If we cannot rewrite the past, we can at least be intentional about the future. We may not be able to change the perspectives of older generations, but we can choose how we respond to them. More importantly, how we shape the environment for those who come after us. Change, in this sense, becomes quieter. More personal. But no less significant. And part of that is choosing not to internalize the same standards that diminished us. Don’t stoop to their level. Not because we are above them, but because continuing the same patterns only ensures they survive. Many of them, at some point in their lives, likely endured the same, if not worse. And yet, the absence of empathy can still sting. But that is precisely why it matters that we choose differently.
We remind ourselves—constantly, if we have to—that our worth is not something to be negotiated in conversations like those. It is not defined by who stands beside us, but by the life we are building for ourselves. By our won sense of fulfillment, pride and direction. And that’s not always easy to hold onto. Because if there’s one quiet truth about being a young adult today, it’s that very few people are as “fine” as they claim to be. Not in this economy and certainly, not in this world that demands so much while offering so little certainty in return. We are all, in some way, figuring things out as we go, trying our best to build something stable out of instability. So take it one day at a time. Find grounding in your own progress, however small it may seem. Celebrate the things that matter to you, even when others don’t see their value. And when the noise gets too loud, when expectations start to feel suffocating, come back to yourself. Because at the end of the day, that is the one place where your worth has always been yours to define. Sincerely, Cherie. The Whiffler is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell The Whiffler that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.
|
genderequalitygoals
genderequalitygoals
Saturday, 11 April 2026
The Weight Women Quietly Carry
Friday, 10 April 2026
A Different Kind of Bet
For years, Roosevelt Island did not behave like a system constrained by limits. Internally, the budget was often treated less as a boundary and more as a reservoir to be used. Projects moved forward even when long-term costs were unclear or likely to exceed what the Island could reasonably sustain. Former insiders describe a pattern where available funds were expected to be spent, driven in part by a persistent belief that any surplus would revert to the State. That assumption, they say, was used to justify a simple approach: spend what you have while you have it.
The results were visible. Capital projects expanded beyond initial expectations. Operating costs followed. And when the bills came due, the pressure shifted back to residents and users. The Sportspark stands as a familiar example. Costs ballooned well beyond early projections, followed by attempts to raise rates to close the gap. The logic was not unique to one project. It reflected a broader posture toward spending. As one longtime observer, David Stone, used to put it, there was always an appetite for ribbon cuttings. The moment of completion mattered. The long-term cost often came later. That history matters because it defines the baseline. Not a system living within its means, but one that too often treated its means as something to be fully exhausted. The Shift: Looking Beyond the IslandA day after the vote, the outcome feels almost inevitable. The RIOC Board approved the resolution unanimously, a quiet consensus around something that, on paper, reads like a routine extension. But unanimity does not make it ordinary. Beneath the formality sits something more significant: an attempt to change how the Island funds itself. Not by raising fees or cutting services, but by looking outward. By asking a question that feels obvious in hindsight: why should Roosevelt Island shoulder the full cost of serving a public that extends far beyond its residents? The idea itself is straightforward. Pursue external funding, state, federal, and agency-based grants, that align with the Island’s infrastructure, environmental, and operational needs. Identify opportunities where Roosevelt Island is not just eligible, but relevant, and then go after them. This is not a new concept in government. But it is, in many ways, new here. And that distinction matters because it signals a shift in mindset, from managing scarcity to exploring possibility. The Operator Behind the IdeaAt the center of that shift is RIOC’s Chief Operating Officer, Dhruvika Amin. She is not a public speaker. She is not charismatic, and she does not operate as a populist. There is no attempt to win the room. Her approach is different. She is a numbers person. Her focus is on how a budget holds together, how it breaks, and how to prevent that break from reaching residents in the form of higher costs or reduced services. Where others chase visibility, her instinct is structural: balance the system, protect the baseline, and then find ways to grow it. Because identifying new revenue streams is not just about opportunity. It is about preventing the cycle that has defined much of RIOC’s past, where spending decisions eventually force difficult corrections on the public. That instinct has already surfaced. In a prior board discussion, as Eleanor Rivers observed, a request to increase Public Purpose Funds met visible hesitation from some resident board members. The moment did not turn into confrontation, but it revealed a willingness to push when the numbers called for it. There is no guarantee this strategy will succeed. The mechanics, including the choice of external partners, remain largely out of public view. What has been presented offers a framework, but not yet a full accounting of outcomes. That will matter. A Shift Worth NotingThe contrast with the past is what gives this moment its weight. For years, the Island operated as if whatever it had should be spent. The question was how to allocate, not whether to expand. The result was a pattern of visible projects followed by quieter financial pressure. This initiative moves in the opposite direction. It starts with the premise that the Island should not carry the full burden of what it supports. That if it serves the city, the state, and a broader public, then its funding should reflect that reality. It is an attempt to shift the model from consumption to leverage. That does not make it easy. Not every grant will be worth pursuing. Some will introduce constraints. Others will require matching funds, reporting, or long timelines that complicate execution. And the choice of partners, along with the discipline to pursue only what makes sense, will ultimately determine whether the idea delivers. Those details are not yet fully visible. The BetBecause RIOC, as it often does, hides in plain sight. Basic questions about what has been pursued, what has been secured, and what it has cost do not receive direct answers. They require formal requests, filings, and time. Information that should be readily understood instead moves through a process designed to delay it. We have submitted those FOIL requests. And we will wait. Not because delay is acceptable, but because it has become the only path to clarity. The idea itself is worth paying attention to. If it works, it could begin to rebalance how the Island funds itself. If it does not, the costs will surface, as they always do, later. Either way, the outcome should not remain obscured. The Island has been asked to trust the process. What remains to be seen is whether the process is willing to be seen at all. The idea is clear. What is not clear is everything around it.
Subscribe for free to receive updates on new posts and support our work.
© 2026 Theo Gobblevelt |
The Weight Women Quietly Carry
Growing up as women in a culture that measures us by more than ourselves. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ...
-
Dear Reader, To read this week's post, click here: https://teachingtenets.wordpress.com/2025/07/02/aphorism-24-take-care-of-your-teach...
-
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: AOM 2025 PDW ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ...





