CfP on the Moral Foundations of Entrepreneurial Societies (Newsround)Also a I had a Crossroads piece published in BJM about Time & Interdisciplinarity that references business and management history
Contents
1. The Moral Foundations of Entrepreneurial SocietiesFourth Historical Entrepreneurship Research Symposium (HERS 2027) January 29–30, 2027Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies,
About the SymposiumOver the past two decades, the historical turn in entrepreneurship and management research has shown how historical sources, methods, and reasoning can reshape theory. HERS 2027 invites scholars to carry this agenda into new terrain: the use of historical scholarship to deepen moral and political reasoning about the relationship between entrepreneurship, organizations, and society. Entrepreneurs are celebrated for creating opportunities, challenging incumbents, and imagining futures others cannot yet see. Entrepreneurial freedom, innovation, and competition are widely regarded as engines of prosperity and societal progress. Yet the very qualities that make entrepreneurship celebrated have also made it a source of public concern. The disruption that drives innovation unsettles institutions and livelihoods, and the freedom that fuels experimentation resists easy accountability. Debates over social media platforms, artificial intelligence, and environmental sustainability turn on the societal consequences of entrepreneurial activity, how responsibility for those consequences is attributed, and the institutions through which societies respond. At the heart of these debates are competing moral understandings of entrepreneurship. When does seizing an opportunity become exploitation? When is breaking the rules innovation, and when is it misconduct? How did independence, risk-taking, disruption, and growth come to look like virtues? Such questions direct attention beyond the ethical judgments of individual entrepreneurs and their organizations to the moral foundations of entrepreneurial societies: the historically constituted values, justifications, and institutional arrangements through which entrepreneurial activity becomes desirable. What, then, are the moral foundations of a good entrepreneurial society? HERS 2027 invites scholars to investigate this question through humanistic research and theoretical inquiry, with particular emphasis on the historical construction of entrepreneurial virtues and moral boundaries. Qualities such as independence, ambition, risk-taking, and disruption are historically constituted ideals through which entrepreneurial conduct is justified, and distinctions between entrepreneurial freedom and social responsibility rest on deep-seated and often unarticulated moral assumptions. Examining how these virtues and boundaries emerged, and how they have been contested, offers an opportunity to reconsider the categories through which entrepreneurship and its relationship to society are understood—and to reflect on the possibilities and limitations of contemporary theories of entrepreneurship. The symposium welcomes a plurality of intellectual traditions and normative perspectives, including political philosophy, business and economic history, classical liberalism and Austrian economics, institutional and evolutionary economics, historical sociology, organization theory, science and technology studies, and critical perspectives on entrepreneurialism. These traditions offer different understandings of entrepreneurial agency, market processes, freedom, responsibility, and societal progress. We seek to bring them into productive conversation, examining the historical experiences and moral assumptions that inform their respective perspectives. While HERS 2027 centers on this theme, we will also consider submissions that advance the use of historical sources, methods, and reasoning in entrepreneurship, management, and organization studies more broadly. Themes and QuestionsWe welcome historically grounded empirical and conceptual contributions addressing questions such as: Submission GuidelinesWe invite extended abstracts of 1–2 pages (references excluded) outlining the research question and expected theoretical or conceptual contribution; the theoretical perspective and relevant literature; the historical context, sources, and methodology; and the expected or preliminary findings. Submission deadline: December 15, 2026Notification: December 31, 2026 Submit to: https://hers-2027.lovable.app/ Format and ParticipationHERS 2027 will take place in person at the Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, University of Southern California, in Los Angeles, CA, USA, on January 29–30, 2027. About HERSThe Historical Entrepreneurship Research Symposium (HERS) is an ongoing forum for scholars working at the intersection of entrepreneurship, history, organizations, and society. Building on earlier gatherings in 2019, 2021, and 2025, the symposium brings together an interdisciplinary community committed to advancing historically informed entrepreneurship research and fostering conversations across disciplinary and theoretical boundaries. HERS 2027 continues this conversation by turning attention to the moral foundations of entrepreneurial societies and the contribution of historical scholarship to contemporary debates about entrepreneurship and the public good. Organizers and Contact Information:
The symposium is a collaboration between the Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies at the University of Southern California and the Rethinking Entrepreneurship in Society research project at Copenhagen Business School, funded by the Carlsberg Foundation. We look forward to continuing the HERS conversations and advancing research on historical entrepreneurship as a resource for reimagining the possibilities of entrepreneurial societies. 2. How Assumptions About Time Divide and Connect Epistemic Communities in Business and ManagementCheeky, I know, but, as it has been a quiet week, I almost did not send out a Newsround this week. So you know for the future — no Monday, no relevant news. Anyway, I thought I’d mention my advance online piece because it a) places Business and Management History into the wider context of the highly interdisciplinary business school world, b) it’s open access, and c) it’s short! You're currently a free subscriber to History in Organizations. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
|
genderequalitygoals
genderequalitygoals
Monday, 2 November 2026
CfP on the Moral Foundations of Entrepreneurial Societies (Newsround)
Sunday, 1 November 2026
Albert Camus, the Radium Girls, and Common Decency
Last week we went to watch a school production of Radium Girls. For those who don’t know the story, it’s about a group of young women in 1920s America who were slowly poisoned by their jobs. Many of the actual Radium Girls were teenagers, and so it was particularly powerful and poignant to watch my 15-year-old daughter’s classmates re-enacting scenes that actually took place a hundred years ago. What happened, during and after the First World War, was that factories in the US hired young women to paint watch and instrument dials with luminous radium paint. It was seen as a good job – well paid, clean, even a little glamorous, given the prestige of making important equipment for the war: glow-in-the-dark tools that would help the soldiers. Because the paint glowed, some of the women painted their nails and teeth with it for fun. Furthermore, to get a fine point on their brushes, they were taught a technique known as “lip, dip, paint” which encouraged them to shape the bristles between their lips, dip in the paint, and then apply. Over and over, all day long. Tragically, with every lick, they were swallowing radium. And, in time, the women began to fall seriously ill. Their symptoms included crumbling jaws, anaemia, bone disease and cancers. Many died young, and although the companies had reason to suspect the danger, they denied responsibility and fought the women in the courts. They even questioned the women’s characters, with suggestions that their illnesses were down to syphilis rather than the paint they’d been told was safe. It’s a pattern we’ve seen many times since: those with power dismissing those without it, and, all too often, men deciding whether women are to be believed. In the play last week, as in real life, all of the decision-makers on the company side were men. So too were the physicians examining, and dismissing, the workers’ symptoms. But it was the women themselves who eventually fought back. Their legal battles, carried on even as they were dying, became landmark cases because they helped establish that employers can be held responsible for occupational disease. This paved the way for many of the workplace health and safety protections we now take for granted. The French writer Albert Camus, who would have turned 113 this Saturday, had a line for this kind of shared courage: “I rebel – therefore we exist.” For Camus, standing up to injustice was never a lonely act because it bound people together. The Radium Girls are a perfect example of this. None of them could have taken on the companies alone, but together they changed the law, not just for themselves but for generations of workers who came after them. Thankfully, most of us don’t work with radioactive paint, and physical safety at work has come a very long way since the 1920s. However, “duty of care” doesn’t simply stop at basic health and safety clauses, because many of the risks people face at work today are psychological. In many ways, I’d say that psychological risks - much like radium - are also invisible. They build up slowly, and the damage often isn’t obvious until it’s serious. I hear about people’s unmanageable workloads a fair bit. I listen to friends and colleagues describe the constant pressure they feel they’re under at work, with too few people doing too much. In spite of these realities, I know plenty of folks who simply keep going. With laptops and phones, it’s far too easy to have your work follow you into your evenings, through your weekends, and your family holiday time. While remote and hybrid working does have benefits, it can also leave people struggling alone, with no one close enough to notice they’re not OK. And, just like the Radium Girls, many people still stay quiet about the stress and anxiety their jobs cause them, worried they won’t be believed. That worry isn’t unfounded either, particularly for women, who still too often find their exhaustion put down to “not coping”, and their symptoms taken less seriously, whether by managers or by doctors. Some of the damage, though, is baked into our everyday routines. Much like “lip, dip, paint”, some of our most harmful habits are simply how things are done: sending late-night emails, sitting in back-to-back meetings with no breaks, praising the person who never takes a day off. Take your pick. A duty of care is a legal responsibility. However, the best leaders in any workplace treat it as something much more human. Unlike Ricky Gervais’s character, David Brent - the bumbling, self-obsessed office manager - a good boss will notice the warning signs, ask questions and actively listen to the answers. They’ll also make it safe for people to speak up, be quick to find solutions, and won’t be afraid to move away from doing things “how they’ve always been done” - all while modelling good practice themselves. In our increasingly digital world, where so much of how people are really doing is hidden behind a screen, these instinctive behaviours of the good boss are more critical than ever. Camus understood this part, too. In The Plague, his novel about a town gripped by an epidemic, the doctor at the centre of the story says that “the only means of fighting a plague is – common decency.” No grand gestures or heroics, just ordinary people paying attention and doing right by one another. A century on from the Radium Girls, the hazards have changed, but the core question hasn’t: are we paying close enough attention to the people around us? Watching those actors on stage last week, the poignancy I felt was also linked to knowing that in a few years those students will be starting their own working lives. I only hope the workplaces they walk into will be ones where someone notices, asks, and listens. See you next week! Thanks for reading Saigonsays! This is a passion project rather than a livelihood, and is currently free. However, I’d always be thrilled if you wanted to subscribe, pledge or buy me a coffee to support my work. saigonsays is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell saigonsays that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.
© 2026 Tim Bishop |
CfP on the Moral Foundations of Entrepreneurial Societies (Newsround)
Also a I had a Crossroads piece published in BJM about Time & Interdisciplinarity that references business and management history ...
-
Dear Reader, To read this week's post, click here: https://teachingtenets.wordpress.com/2025/07/02/aphorism-24-take-care-of-your-teach...





