 | ross1948 Sep 28 |
Hard to tell the difference, really, RT spinning quite offensive junk... ..about the Baltic republics removing monuments to the rapacious Red Army...  . ...which held them in servitude for decades, protecting the Kemlin's quislings... .  . ..and Hard Talk yesterday, BBC's Stephen Sackur barracking Evgeny Popov, a Russian MP, the BBC undermining his own case by quoting the notoriously dishonest New York Times… …which can't even get its own country's history straight! Sackur did not go as far as his BBC comrade, Ole VD, in terms of abusing Putin… ....but the Hard Talk host's prejudices are so blatant, depending on his guests left or right identity...  ....that it's impossible to to take him seriously as an objective seeker-after truth. And while the Russian stoutly defended himself, there was the BBC text news dribbling across the bottom of the screen, about 'discredited' referenda in occupied Ukrainian territory. I doubt that voting there is free and/or fair.  But if the BBC were fair and balanced... . .. ... ...then the word should be 'disputed' - not 'discredited.' Don't get me wrong. I support Ukrainians' right to live free in their own land. But I'm fed up with the BBC's refusal to deliver on its charter duty, objective and impartial reporting. |
| | |  | You can also reply to this email to leave a comment. |
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment