genderequalitygoals

genderequalitygoals

Sunday, 2 July 2023

[New post] CFA: MAP & Bloomsbury Academic Volume on Structural Injustice in Philosophy

Site logo image Carline Klijnman posted: "MAP & Bloomsbury Academic Volume on Structural Injustice in Philosophy CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS Editors: Alexandria James (MAP),  Milana Kostic (MAP), Maeve McKeown (University of Groningen), and Robin Zheng (University of Glasgow) Deadline for 5" PEA Soup

CFA: MAP & Bloomsbury Academic Volume on Structural Injustice in Philosophy

Carline Klijnman

Jul 2

MAP & Bloomsbury Academic Volume on Structural Injustice in Philosophy

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS

Editors: Alexandria James (MAP),  Milana Kostic (MAP), Maeve McKeown (University of Groningen), and Robin Zheng (University of Glasgow)

Deadline for 500-word abstracts/pitches: July 31st, 2023

We invite submissions on the use of structural injustice as a conceptual tool for explaining underrepresentation and related issues in the discipline of philosophy and related disciplines.

More than any other Humanities discipline, philosophy has an underrepresentation problem (Schwitzgebel et al, 2021). Philosophers have appealed to concepts such as implicit bias and stereotype threat to explain this (e.g., Saul, 2013; Saul & Brownstein, 2016). Recently, these psychological and individualistic explanations have been critiqued. For instance, Haslanger and Zheng have pointed out the need for structural explanations of social phenomena (e.g., Haslanger, 2016; Zheng 2018). Even though the idea that education systems are structured in an unjust way, i.e., that they are structured in a way that promotes reproduction and legitimization of social (gender, racial, class, ability, etc.) inequalities, has existed for a long time (e.g., Bourdieu, 1990), there has only recently been systematic work using structural frameworks to explain the underrepresentation problem in philosophy (e.g., McKeown, 2022). This MAP / Bloomsbury Academic edited collection on structural injustice aims to redress this.

We aim to uncover the exact structures and mechanisms at play in classrooms, conference rooms, conversations, hiring procedures, evaluative practices (e.g., grading, peer review, rankings of philosophy departments) that perpetuate social inequalities in the academic setting and in professional philosophy more specifically, including during undergraduate degrees and grad school, the job market, and temporary and tenured faculty positions. The overarching goal is to present an encompassing framework for understanding how various social-structural processes function to produce and reproduce conditions in which people of color, gender minorities, working class people, people with disabilities, and other marginalized groups are systematically excluded, disadvantaged and their work disvalued (Young, 2011). Topics include, but are not limited to:

  • How can structural injustice be used as a tool to explain underrepresentation of social groups and marginalized epistemologies in philosophy?
  • What makes unjust structures so persistent in philosophy (i.e., what are the exact mechanisms for creating and reinforcing unjust structures in philosophy specifically)?
  • Why is philosophy as a discipline especially susceptible to reproducing racial, gender, class, ability, and other social inequalities?
  • Linguistic injustice as structural injustice (e.g., the role of English language as lingua francain philosophy in perpetuating structural injustices).
  • Discursive injustice (Kukla, 2014) as structural injustice in philosophy.
  • Academic migration, precarity of academic labor, material and socio-economic conditions and their role in reproducing social inequalities in philosophy.
  • Harassment, bullying and abuse in academic philosophy and their contribution to structural injustice.
  • Metaphilosophy and structural injustice (how do debates on delineating the scope and method of philosophy, i.e., what Kristie Dotson calls the 'culture of justification' (Dotson, 2012), contribute to perpetuating unjust structures in professional philosophy?)
  • Why does structural injustice in philosophy matter?

Formats include:

  • Standard scholarly articles that theorize or apply the structural injustice framework to philosophy (5000-8000 words).
  • More personal accounts (comparable to Hypatia'slong-running collection of 'Musings') on structural injustice in philosophy. While such essays may benefit from being more personal in their content or less scholarly in their style and form, they should remain theoretically rigorous and methodologically sound (3000-5000 words).

To submit your abstract for a MAP & Bloomsbury Edited Volume on Structural Injustice, please complete this form by July 31st, 2023. More info on the MAP website.

 

Comment

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from PEA Soup.
Change your email settings at manage subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://peasoupblog.com/2023/07/cfa-map-bloomsbury-academic-volume-on-structural-injustice-in-philosophy/

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app to use Reader anywhere, anytime

Follow your favorite sites, save posts to read later, and get real-time notifications for likes and comments.

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com on Twitter WordPress.com on Facebook WordPress.com on Instagram WordPress.com on YouTube
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Learn how to build your website with our video tutorials on YouTube.


Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at July 02, 2023
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

GOOD TROUBLE - ON SALE NOW

Abolish ICE & More from Blessed Bee by HP ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌     ͏ ‌    ...

  • [New post] “You Might Go to Prison, Even if You’re Innocent”
    Delaw...
  • Autistic Mental Health Conference 2025
    Online & In-Person ͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏    ...
  • [Blog Post] Principle #16: Take care of your teacher self.
    Dear Reader,  To read this week's post, click here:  https://teachingtenets.wordpress.com/2025/07/02/aphorism-24-take-care-of-your-teach...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

GenderEqualityDigest
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • January 2026 (36)
  • December 2025 (52)
  • November 2025 (57)
  • October 2025 (65)
  • September 2025 (71)
  • August 2025 (62)
  • July 2025 (59)
  • June 2025 (55)
  • May 2025 (34)
  • April 2025 (62)
  • March 2025 (50)
  • February 2025 (39)
  • January 2025 (44)
  • December 2024 (32)
  • November 2024 (19)
  • October 2024 (15)
  • September 2024 (19)
  • August 2024 (2651)
  • July 2024 (3129)
  • June 2024 (2936)
  • May 2024 (3138)
  • April 2024 (3103)
  • March 2024 (3214)
  • February 2024 (3054)
  • January 2024 (3244)
  • December 2023 (3092)
  • November 2023 (2678)
  • October 2023 (2235)
  • September 2023 (1691)
  • August 2023 (1347)
  • July 2023 (1465)
  • June 2023 (1484)
  • May 2023 (1488)
  • April 2023 (1383)
  • March 2023 (1469)
  • February 2023 (1268)
  • January 2023 (1364)
  • December 2022 (1351)
  • November 2022 (1343)
  • October 2022 (1062)
  • September 2022 (993)
  • August 2022 (1355)
  • July 2022 (1771)
  • June 2022 (1299)
  • May 2022 (1228)
  • April 2022 (1325)
  • March 2022 (1264)
  • February 2022 (858)
  • January 2022 (903)
  • December 2021 (1201)
  • November 2021 (3152)
  • October 2021 (2609)
Powered by Blogger.