For anyone who is trying to follow the subject of pediatric gender-transition medical treatment, there is something filed today in Alabama that includes a dump of WPATH internal documents.
Mumsnet explains:
Benjamin Ryan, science and health journalist, has created a detailed tweet thread discussing the Attorney General's motion for summary judgement in the case that is seeking to overturn the state's ban on paediatric transition.
The thread contains lots of evidence citing internal WPATH documents that the Attorney General argues undermine the WPATH's credibility.
The Cass Review is cited by the Attorney General as evidence that WPATH scientific literature is weak and unreliable.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1806753484114481646.html
If you are following the Cass report in the UK, you will probably want to follow this one. There are a lot of court cases about, including something recent at SCOTUS, but this particular one seems to be rising above the background noise because it has to do with the organizations that set the standards for medical care, and how reliable they are.
Also WPATH executive leadership had a recent internal meltdown, something about eunuch gender porn, whatever that is, which I have not been able to verify enough of to opine on myself, but I know some of my readers are following this topic and may want to look at the source documents.
This particular court case is being referred to in the press as Boe v. Marshall.
Twitter thread (same as the thread reader) :
No comments:
Post a Comment