 There are moments when history compresses itself into a symbol. Not a slogan. This week on Madlik Disruptive Torah, we rebroadcast an episode about tekhelet, that rare, stubborn, unforgettable blue — a color that Judaism has been thinking about for a very long time. As antisemitism re-enters public life, Jews are once again reaching for symbols. Simple ones. Quiet ones. Symbols that say: I’m here. I’m not hiding. And I’m not alone.
And here’s the thing: Judaism has always understood that power.
That migration is the story of tekhelet. Blue as ArchitectureThe Torah does not introduce tekhelet casually. It saturates sacred space with it.
Then:
Then the inner curtain:
Then the priestly garments:
And even the Divine Name is suspended:
As Rabbi Adam Mintz puts it:
Blue is not aesthetic flourish. From Priest to PeopleAnd then something radical happens. The Torah takes this royal color — once restricted to sacred architecture and priestly authority — and democratizes it.
The purpose?
Not priests. One thread. Exodus had already promised:
Tekhelet is how that promise gets worn. Architecture That Foreshadowed Its Own AbsenceThere is a strange phrase at the beginning of the Mishkan narrative. God commands:
Not in it. But among them. The grammar is unsettling. And yet the verse hints, maybe foreshadows that the structure itself is not the final dwelling place. Among them. In the episode, I found myself returning to that line:
Tekhelet follows that same trajectory. At first it belongs to sacred architecture — woven into curtains, suspended from gold, draped across priestly garments. Then the Torah does something radical. It takes the color of the sanctuary and attaches it to the corners of ordinary clothing. One thread. On every Jew. It is as if the Torah anticipated the day when there would be no Mishkan, no Temple, no ephod, no tzitz, no priestly cult. When that day came, the architecture would be gone — The priestly blue would not disappear. It would decentralize. Just as God’s dwelling shifts from a structure to a people, tekhelet shifts from sacred space to social identity. The Mishkan was portable. And perhaps that was the point all along. Why Blue?The rabbis famously ask the question:
Blue lifts the eye upward — sea to sky to transcendence. But the story of blue is not just metaphor. It is economics. It is ecology. It is law. Tekhelet was rare. It came from a Mediterranean mollusk. It was expensive. It was prestigious. And where there is prestige, there is imitation. The Counterfeit BlueThe Talmud already warns about counterfeit tekhelet. In Menachot 40a–44a, the rabbis distinguish between authentic dye and substitutes. This wasn’t theoretical — it was commercial reality. Tekhelet was valuable. As Rabbi Mintz observed in the episode:
Yigal Yadin — Israeli general and archaeologist — excavated caves associated with the Bar Kochba revolt. Among tefillin and ritual objects, he found wool dyed deep blue. It seemed electrifying: Jews under Roman persecution preserving tekhelet.
But laboratory testing revealed something sobering. The dye was not derived from the murex mollusk. It was counterfeit. Suddenly the Talmud’s warnings were not abstract. They were archaeological. For centuries, we assumed tekhelet disappeared because the mollusk went extinct. The mitzvah became impossible to fulfill. White threads replaced blue. But what if that assumption is wrong? What if the species did not disappear? What if the problem wasn’t extinction — but corruption? Tekhelet required trust. A specific sea creature. Skilled extraction. Honest distribution. If counterfeit dye flooded the market, ordinary Jews could not distinguish authentic from fake. The commandment itself became compromised. And here is the disruptive possibility: What if the rabbis did not lose tekhelet — Not because it was gone. But because it was corrupted. Halakhah has precedent for suspending practices when integrity collapses. Better white and honest than blue and fraudulent. If so, the disappearance of tekhelet was not defeat. It was protection. Halakhah has precedent for this kind of intervention. In Sukkah 34b (see also 41b in some printings), the Talmud records that myrtle branches used for the lulav had become exorbitantly expensive. Merchants were exploiting the mitzvah. The rabbis responded with an extraordinary move: they threatened to redefine what qualified as a valid hadas if price gouging continued. In other words, they were prepared to adjust the law in order to break a corrupt marketplace.
The Blue Was HiddenThe Midrash records simply:
Hidden by history. For centuries, Jews wore white. Not because they forgot blue — As I reflect in the episode:
The white tallit became a monument to absence. And absence, too, teaches. Ecology and CovenantTekhelet depends on a living creature. Which means a mitzvah depended on biodiversity. If we fail as guardians of creation, we don’t just lose species — we lose commandments. That is not environmentalism as fashion. That is covenant. From Tallit to FlagModern Zionism instinctively reached for this palette. The Israeli flag did not invent blue. It inherited it — from the tallit, from the thread, from the Mishkan. Rabbi Herzog’s prayer for the State of Israel calls it:
Sprouting. Not exploding. Blue does not shout. It persists. A Whisper of ResilienceEmpires tried to erase Jewish symbols. And still — the thread survived. Tekhelet was once royal. So when Jews choose blue today — on a tallit, on a flag, or even in a small square — it is not nostalgia. It is memory. Blue is not decoration. It is declaration. Sefaria Source Sheet: https://voices.sefaria.org/sheets/383005 Listen on Spotify:
|
Wednesday, 25 February 2026
Why Blue Matters
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Autism & Neurodiversity Writing From February
Explore the writing I've done this month ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ...
-
Dear Reader, To read this week's post, click here: https://teachingtenets.wordpress.com/2025/07/02/aphorism-24-take-care-of-your-teach...
-
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: AOM 2025 PDW ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ...
No comments:
Post a Comment