[New post] Baptismal fonts – wanted, unwanted and re-discovered

David Pocklington posted: "Since our post They bury fonts, don't they? in 2015 we have covered many examples of the movement, the replacement, and sometimes destruction of baptismal fonts. This update was prompted by recent CFCE considerations of submissions in relation to Chichest" New post on Law & Religion UK Baptismal fonts – wanted, unwanted and re-discovered by David Pocklington Since our post They bury fonts, don't they? in 2015 we have covered many examples of the movement, the replacement, and sometimes destruction of baptismal fonts. This update was prompted by recent CFCE considerations of submissions in relation to Chichester Cathedral and Gloucester Cathedral. These are reviewed below in addition to summaries all of the consistory court judgments relating to fonts, Guidance from the Church of England and links to other L&RUK posts in this area. Read more of this post David Pocklington | February 25, 2022 at 8:30 am | Tags: cathedrals, Church of England, fonts | Categories: cathedrals, Church of England, faculty jurisdiction, fonts | URL: https://lawandreligionuk.com/?p=67686 Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Law & Religion UK. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/02/25/baptismal-fonts-wanted-unwanted-and-re-discovered/