͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Being a Scholar in Trumpian times

Some thoughts about doing the right thing as an academic in an autocracy

Nov 6

READ IN APP

It’s only normal to be stunned, as the US just voted “yes” for authoritarianism and against democracy. Which was a yes for hate against immigrants and trans people, against climate action and reproductive healthcare access, and so on. We all understand the stakes.

I’ve been trying to process this harm and connecting with friends who are at greater risk, trying to muddle on before figuring out how to move forward.

In search of advice, funnily enough I just found inspiration from… myself? When Trump was elected eight years ago, I was more worried about how to navigate that new future. I ended up writing an opinion piece for the Chronicle of Higher Education entitled “Being a Scholar in Trumpian Times.” It was precisely about how we as academics need to move forward in authoritarian times. I gave it a re-read, and I think it’s more relevant now than ever.

Curiously enough, while The Chronicle has full archive of my pieces that they’ve published, this is the one piece that somehow got memory-holed out of the archive. Not sure how much I should read into that. I can’t find the original piece online, but since The Chronicle doesn’t want it up anymore, I’ll take the liberty of republishing it here for you. I found it affirming and it showed some steel and sense of purpose that I had several weeks after the ill-fated election of 2016, which gives me hope that I’ll find it again in myself soon enough. Maybe it can give you a little hope, too. Here goes:

As academics, our job responsibilities weren’t changed by the election of Donald Trump. But his presidency does promise to make our jobs more difficult — and our work more important than ever.

Like free speech and freedom of the press, scholarly inquiry is an ingredient of a functional democracy. With our federal government careening toward an anti-intellectual autocracy — led by a science-denying president who panders to white male insecurities and prejudices — the open exchange of ideas is as essential as ever.

I've given a lot of thought lately to how we as academics can carry on. And I've identified four responsibilities we face as members of the academic community.

Keep up our research. It matters more than ever. I am a biologist who, very soon, will be working under a government that denies evolution and climate change as realities. That is hard to swallow. As academics, we must serve as keepers of rational thought, scientific investigation, and critical discourse. My own research program uses experimental natural history to discover new phenomena in tropical rainforests, and to understand how animals respond to rapidly changing environments. That type of basic research is important because it advances the progress of knowledge and provides avenues to train a new generation of scientists. Your own academic work remains important, too. The need for intellectual activity will be more urgent when we have an anti-intellectual government.
Teach critical thinking. Our students need the ideas and skills that we are teaching. It's our job to offer them expertise in collecting and weighing evidence to reach rational and well-supported conclusions. When people make decisions, they're prone to use their own emotions instead of evidence. As professors who advocate reason, we cannot change that. Inside our classrooms, however, we can get people used to making decisions on the basis of evidence, which should extend into more open-minded discourse outside the classroom. Can this make a difference? A supportive and free-thinking community certainly made a difference for former white nationalist Derek Black.
Advocate publicly for evidence-based decision making. Our new government is planning measures that will accelerate climate change globally and remove resources critical for sustaining human health. My scholarship, as an ecologist, directly informs the public about how animals and ecosystems are responding to climate change, and I should not try to minimize my expertise when I’m communicating with members of the public. Regardless of your research specialty, we need your contributions in the public sphere. The public has to understand the need for basic and applied research in science (a long-term battle). At this moment, the costs of history repeating itself are particularly great, and now we need our historians, sociologists, economists, and political philosophers to step up to the plate, too. It’s up to us to put science and fact-based decision-making in the public eye — in the news, in the blogs, and in social media. We need scholars to become part of the national conversation.
Build diverse and inclusive academic communities. Since Trump prevailed in the election, some of his supporters have been working hard to make this country hostile to ethnic and religious minorities. Trump has not disavowed his endorsement by the KKK, and he recently appointed an overt alt-right white nationalist as his chief strategist. Previous administrations have prioritized increasing the diversity of our nation's scientific workforce, and universities have been working, with various levels of success, toward equity and ethnic pluralism. Now that swastika graffiti is appearing on schools and universities across the country, we as academics need to be more vocal and take more action to promote diversity on our campuses. We must place the highest priority on the safety and inclusion of the marginalized members of our communities. At the same time, we are dealing with an administration that is planning a registry of all members of a particular religion. We must unabashedly work for the inclusion of scientists from underrepresented groups as they face greater hostility in our own country.

As academics, our job is the same under a Trump administration: We research, we teach, we conduct outreach, and we build a supportive community. However, we must redouble our efforts, because with anti-intellectuals running the show, our work and our community service is needed now more than ever. If we isolate our teaching, research, and service within the walls of our universities, then we are complicit in the disregard for the value of our work. We must engage.

Quote from James Baldwin: "I have never been in despair about the world. Enraged. I've been enraged by the world, but never despair. I cannot afford despair... you can't tell the children that there is no hope."

The only thing I can say about the future for Science For Everyone is that I’m going to keep working hard to provide context for ongoing and new challenges in science and higher education, and will do my best to be a conduit for responsible journalism in a time when major news outlets are aligned with state interests rather than those of the public (including us scientists, academics, and students). I’ve reinvested my subscriptions in the Washington Post and the LA Times into ProPublica, as well as financially supporting other newsletters as well. If you find what happens here to be valuable, please toss me a bit of support which will keep me going. However, this site will always be fully open and at no cost to everybody.

You’re currently a free subscriber to Science For Everyone. Thanks for your support! If you wish to support this work more, then you could pay for a subscription.