Between that day and July 1, IRCC said it has caught 9,175 letters that were never issued by a Canadian school.
Those 9,175 letters were out of a total of 361,718 letters checked by IRCC and the schools.
These letters "may be an indicator of fraud," IRCC wrote in a statement, but each one will need to be checked by an officer.
The department declined to make anyone available for an interview, and agreed to answer questions only by email.
It said it is "focused on identifying culprits, not penalizing victims" of fraud.
In response to questions about Akinlade's case and why IRCC believes she knew about the fake letter, IRCC pointed back to its officer's decision based on the "balance of probabilities."
"Applicants are responsible for all the information on their application," IRCC wrote, noting that Akinlade had an opportunity to address the officer's concerns.
Onus on the applicant
Sandhu said it's not clear to her exactly why IRCC believes Akinlade knew the letter was fake.
"If we're going off of hunches, I feel that most officers can be very skeptical when it comes to applicants that claim they were victims of a rogue agent."
Sandhu acknowledged that Canadian immigration rules put the onus for everything in the application on the applicant.
"Even though you may have used an agent, you are still supposed to be aware of everything," she said.
Akinlade said she has learned a "lesson" about finding a reliable agent to help her, but she believes if IRCC looks again at her case it will find she was not complicit in the fake letter.
Her lawyer is submitting her humanitarian application to IRCC in the coming weeks but the application does not give her any right to stay in the country, and it is not clear how many months it could take to process.
"I really want to be investigated," she said, adding that the whole experience has been "traumatic" for her family.
"This is not something I pray for my enemy to experience."
No comments:
Post a Comment